Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Peter French's corporate internal decision structure (CID) analysis shows collectives can be genuine moral agents independent of member awareness.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Moral agency requires consciousness or subjective experience; corporations lack these, making CID structure irrelevant to genuine agency.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
CID analysis conflates structural efficiency with moral responsibility; a system that produces harm is still reducible to individual choices within it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Member unawareness doesn't eliminate individual culpability; it merely obscures it—moral responsibility cannot float free of any conscious agent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Corporations have formal decision procedures (policies, chains of command) that generate actions independent of any single member's intent or knowledge.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Moral agency requires intentional action and responsibility attribution; corporations satisfy both through their CID structures, just as persons do.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We hold corporations legally and practically accountable as unified agents; denying moral agency contradicts our actual treatment of them.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.