Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Plotinus's One transcends being entirely, suggesting that... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A being by substance is not a being by participation.

    Plotinus's One transcends being entirely, suggesting that the highest principle is neither being-by-substance nor being-by-participation but prior to both categories.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Language and categories describing being inevitably fail at ultimate principles, requiring transcendence of all predicative frameworks.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the One were being-by-substance or participation, it would depend on Form of Being, making it derivative rather than ultimate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Mystical experience reports describe encountering reality beyond conceptual dualities, supporting trans-categorical metaphysics.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Claiming the One transcends being while calling it 'the highest principle' uses being-language, creating self-referential incoherence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the One truly transcends all categories, we cannot meaningfully distinguish it from non-existence or make any claims about it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Plotinus must assume being applies to the One to ground causality, making transcendence of being philosophically inconsistent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 linked claim · 2 topics

    Natural Theology1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked
    A being by substance is not a being by participation.

    Related

    A being by substance is not a being by participation.Claiming the One transcends being while calling it 'the highest principle' uses ...If the One truly transcends all categories, we cannot meaningfully distinguish i...If the One were being-by-substance or participation, it would depend on Form of ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Language and categories describing being inevitably fail at ultimate principles,...Mystical experience reports describe encountering reality beyond conceptual dual...Plotinus must assume being applies to the One to ground causality, making transc...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit