Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Poetry and rhetoric employ arbitrary signs. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The meanings of arbitrary signs can be more precisely codified than those of natural signs, making poetry and rhetoric more amenable to systematic interpretation.

    Poetry and rhetoric employ arbitrary signs.

    AestheticsPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsPhilosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Arbitrary signs acquire meaning through convention and can therefore be codified...The meanings of arbitrary signs can be more precisely codified than those of nat...Where signs can be codified, there is more room for precision in interpretation.

    Similar

    Poetry and rhetoric convey their content by artificial (arbitrary/conv...91%Poetry uses arbitrary signs86%The meanings of arbitrary signs can be more precisely codified than th...83%Poetry uses artificial signs whose content is not constrained by the n...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aesthetics-18th-german
    View source passageHide passage
    Mendelssohn concludes the essay on the “Main Principles of the Fine Arts and Sciences” with a brief but pregnant division of the arts. The basis of his division is a distinction between “natural” and “arbitrary” signs, which has precedents in Du Bos, in Leibniz and Wolff, and beyond all of them in St. Augustine. Signs are natural “if the combination of the subject matter signified is grounded in the very properties of what is designated,” as smoke is a natural product of fire or “The passions ar

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective