Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Poetry and rhetoric convey their content by artificial (a... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Poetry and rhetoric belong to the beautiful sciences (belles lettres) rather than the fine arts.

    Poetry and rhetoric convey their content by artificial (arbitrary/conventional) signs.

    AestheticsPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsPhilosophy of Language

    Related

    Arbitrary signs have nothing in common by nature with the designated subject mat...Poetry and rhetoric belong to the beautiful sciences (belles lettres) rather tha...The fine arts employ natural signs; the beautiful sciences employ arbitrary or c...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Poetry and rhetoric employ arbitrary signs.91%Poetry uses artificial signs whose content is not constrained by the n...86%Poetry employs artificial rather than natural signs84%Poetry uses primarily artificial rather than natural signs.84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aesthetics-18th-german
    View source passageHide passage
    Mendelssohn concludes the essay on the “Main Principles of the Fine Arts and Sciences” with a brief but pregnant division of the arts. The basis of his division is a distinction between “natural” and “arbitrary” signs, which has precedents in Du Bos, in Leibniz and Wolff, and beyond all of them in St. Augustine. Signs are natural “if the combination of the subject matter signified is grounded in the very properties of what is designated,” as smoke is a natural product of fire or “The passions ar

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective