Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Pogge's institutional cosmopolitanism holds that shared c... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Reciprocity obligations do not divide neatly state by state.

    Pogge's institutional cosmopolitanism holds that shared coercive institutions—not shared citizenship—ground distributive obligations among persons.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Coercive institutions impose binding rules that constrain freedom, creating special moral responsibility toward those affected by those rules.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Citizenship is contingent and exclusionary, while institutional participation is the actual ground of interdependence and mutual obligation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Global institutions (trade regimes, financial systems, military alliances) coerce billions, yet citizenship-based views deny them distributive claims.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Not all coercive institutions generate equal obligations; distinguishing which ones do requires prior moral principles beyond institutional participation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Citizens depend on state institutions for basic rights and goods in ways non-citizens don't, making citizenship a deeper ground for obligation than mere coercion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The theory struggles to specify which global institutions trigger obligations and at what threshold, making practical application indeterminate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract1 linkedDemocracy & Governance1 linked

    Related

    Citizens depend on state institutions for basic rights and goods in ways non-cit...Citizenship is contingent and exclusionary, while institutional participation is...Coercive institutions impose binding rules that constrain freedom, creating spec...Global institutions (trade regimes, financial systems, military alliances) coerc...
    +3 moreShow less
    Not all coercive institutions generate equal obligations; distinguishing which o...Reciprocity obligations do not divide neatly state by state.The theory struggles to specify which global institutions trigger obligations an...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)