Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Posthumous harm occurs when posthumous events change the value of a person's life for the worse.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Harm requires a subject who is made worse off, but the dead lack the experiential states necessary to be harmed by any event.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Changing the retrospective value of a life does not constitute harm unless the person whose life it is can be disadvantaged by that change.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The value of a life is fixed at death, since no further experiences, achievements, or relations can be added to or subtracted from the completed biographical whole.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Posthumous events that appear to devalue accomplishments merely alter survivors' assessments, not the intrinsic value of the life as actually lived.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Posthumous events may affect the quality of a person's life, say by changing the value of her accomplishments.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Later events may affect the meaning of earlier events, and the latter bears on the value of a person's life.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.