Pragmatic self-refutation, recognized from the Sophists through Wittgenstein's rule-following considerations, holds that one cannot coherently wield a logical tool one is simultaneously exempt from.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
pragmatic self-refutation(Distinguished from logical self-refutation; applies to the relativist's argumentative practice)
A position is pragmatically self-refuting when the act of asserting or arguing for it undermines the conditions necessary for that act to succeed
rule-following considerations(in philosophy of language)
Wittgenstein's famous puzzle about how we know what rule to follow next: if you learn a rule by seeing examples, how do you know you're applying it correctly to new cases you've never seen before?