No other argument is better

SOME

A normative theory offering principles for evaluating analogical arguments is still needed, even if computational models successfully model analogy construction.

Einstein's approach is preferable to the Lorentz-Fitzgerald hypothesis

Golding's version of the Wager argument is not clearly more successful than Pascal's.

Kvanvig has no grounds for thinking that Fitch's conjunction does not designate rigidly

Mill's argument, though poorly framed, retains substantial force when understood on its own terms

Parfit's impersonal reformulation of contractualism is superior to Scanlon's original formulation for the purposes of the convergence argument.

The Roman numeral system is inferior to position systems for general arithmetic

The five lines of response can jointly justify the payoffs of a cultural evolutionary perspective.

The low priors argument addresses the question of which position is the correct default more sophisticatedly and promisingly than analogies to Santa Claus, flying spaghetti monsters, or Russell's teapot.

The objection that Norton's notion of argument is too vague is not the best objection against Norton

The original dilemma can be turned back on the interrogator

The platonist/fictionalist semantic theory is better than other semantic theories of mathematical discourse

The proponent wins the play.

The regress argument is not the best argument for the existence of foundational justification.

The theory of Turing machines is the most general theory of computation possible.

There is a strong (if defeasible) reason to suppose there is no further argument for the account of non-prudential value as consisting in the maximization of power

There is room for both computational and traditional philosophical models of analogical reasoning.

Williams' argument for internalism about reasons is stronger than the Classical Argument for internalism

Eternal conscious torment of the wicked vindicates God's majesty

If the above is true, then no further thought is necessary

No other argument has all of these goods

There are goods created by ECT

ECT indirectly glorifies God's grace

Eternal conscious torment (noun) is the only theory that uses eternal conscious torment (verb)

If something is the best possible Hell, it is the true Hell

Radner's conclusion that the appeal to simplicity is not one of the stronger arguments for seeing all things in God misunderstands Malebranche.

Rosmini's moral principle is supreme.

The cosmological argument does not provide a better account of the cosmos than concluding the cosmos lacks an ultimate account.

These goods are necessary for a true Hell