Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Preferred coherent states tend to get least entangled with the environment and therefore follow the Schrödinger equation more or less undisturbed.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
The selection of 'preferred' coherent states presupposes a classical environment, making the argument circular when explaining classicality's emergence.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Zurek's 'existential interpretation' assumes environmental interaction structures that cannot themselves be derived from the Schrödinger equation alone.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Decoherence suppresses interference terms in a preferred basis but leaves a improper mixture, not definite classical outcomes, as Adler and others have argued.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
An improper mixed state cannot ground the claim that preferred states 'follow the Schrödinger equation undisturbed' since no single branch is selected.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Preferred states are wave packets that are narrow in position and remain narrow because they are also narrow in momentum.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
States that are narrow in both position and momentum tend to get least entangled with the environment.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.