Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Principles (4) and (5) as currently stated restrict meani... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Principles (4) and (5) about language and words may need to be abandoned or reinterpreted to accommodate non-linguistic art.

    Principles (4) and (5) as currently stated restrict meaning and thought to language and words.

    AestheticsPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsPhilosophy of Language

    Related

    A theory of meaning that excludes genuinely independent non-linguistic expressio...Non-linguistic art sometimes expresses meanings and thoughts independently of la...Principles (4) and (5) about language and words may need to be abandoned or rein...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Propositions (4) and (5) are not synonymous, since they convey differe...80%This restriction to a limited set of words is arbitrary given the rich...76%Intentionality (thought in the broad Cartesian sense) must be expressi...75%Annotations are therefore typically restricted to the senses of a few ...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: schleiermacher
    View source passageHide passage
    Where does this leave Schleiermacher in relation to the several issues bearing on his hermeneutics and his philosophy of language that, I suggested, encouraged him to undertake this investigation of non-linguistic art in the first place? Concerning the primary question, whether the non-linguistic arts express meanings and thoughts and if so how, he has now realized that they do indeed (at least sometimes) express meanings and thoughts, but he remains torn on exactly how they do so. Concerning hi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective