Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Propositional attitude reports are sensitive to the specific words used, not just abstract truth conditions (Frege's puzzle, Kripke's 'Paderewski' case).

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Truth conditions fully determine propositional content; if two reports describe identical possible worlds, they express identical propositions regardless of wording.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Apparent sensitivity to words reflects metalinguistic or pragmatic factors, not genuine differences in attitude content itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Internalist cognitive states supervene on brain states; mental content is determined by internal structure, not external naming conventions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Substituting coreferential terms in propositional attitudes changes truth value: 'Oedipus believes he married Jocasta' differs from 'Oedipus believes he married his mother.'
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Speakers competent in English distinguish informativeness: learning 'Hesperus is Phosphorus' provides knowledge that 'Hesperus is Hesperus' does not.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Cognitive significance depends on reference modes (senses), not mere reference; identical referents can present objects differently to subjects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42