Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Propositions that have never been and never will be token... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Propositions that have never been and never will be tokened can still have truth conditions.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Action types inherit truth conditions from both actual and possible token instances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Possible instances suffice to ground the inheritance of truth conditions even when no actual token exists.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Truth conditions require a determinate representational relationship, which only concrete tokening events can establish.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Merely possible tokens cannot ground actual semantic relations without collapsing the distinction between actuality and possibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A proposition whose truth conditions derive solely from non-actual instances has no more semantic standing than a proposition about a round square.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.On Dummettian anti-realist grounds, the truth conditions of a sentence are constituted by our recognitional capacities and verification practices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A proposition that has never been and never will be tokened lies permanently outside any possible verification practice, rendering its 'truth conditions' epistemically idle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Semantic content that is in principle unconnected to any use-practice is not a genuine semantic property but a theoretical fiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    A proposition that has never been and never will be tokened lies permanently out...A proposition whose truth conditions derive solely from non-actual instances has...Action types inherit truth conditions from both actual and possible token instan...Merely possible tokens cannot ground actual semantic relations without collapsin...
    +4 moreShow less
    On Dummettian anti-realist grounds, the truth conditions of a sentence are const...Possible instances suffice to ground the inheritance of truth conditions even wh...Semantic content that is in principle unconnected to any use-practice is not a g...Truth conditions require a determinate representational relationship, which only...

    Similar

    Even if no one has ever tokened a proposition, it can have truth-condi...84%Sentences do not have truth conditions79%Only actually produced sentence-tokens can have a truth-value77%Having truth conditions is the kind of property a type inherits from i...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: propositions-structured
    View source passageHide passage
    Hanks’ explanation of why propositions as act types of the sort described have truth conditions comes in two steps. First, Hanks argues that token acts of predicating properties of objects have truth conditions. Hanks recognizes that some may doubt whether act tokens are the kinds of things that can be true and false. His main argument that they can be is that we have adverbial modifiers ‘truly’ and ‘falsely’ and that these attribute properties to action tokens. So just as ‘quickly’ in ‘Obama qu
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit