Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Psychological harm experienced by donor-conceived individuals is socially constructed rather than necessary or inherent.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Individuals who are unaware that they were donor-conceived show no worse psychological wellbeing than their peers.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the harm were inherent to being reared by non-genetic relations, it would manifest regardless of social awareness or context.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Psychological harms that arise only in certain social contexts are attributable to those social conditions, not to the biological facts themselves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42