Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Punishment cannot be justified even in principle and is morally wrong.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Retributive justice, from Kant through contemporary thinkers like Michael Moore, holds that wrongdoers deserve to suffer proportionate consequences as a matter of basic moral fairness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A moral universe in which wrongdoers suffer no consequences treats victims and perpetrators as morally equivalent, violating the principle that persons are responsible for their choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If desert-based suffering is intrinsically morally required, then the claim that punishment is morally wrong in principle is false regardless of whether consequentialist justifications succeed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.H.L.A. Hart's mixed theory distinguishes the general justifying aim of punishment from the principles governing its distribution, allowing consequentialist goals to justify the institution without reducing each instance to mere utility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The abolitionist argument conflates the failure of any single monolithic justification with the failure of all possible justifications, committing a disjunctive syllogism error.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A pluralist justification combining crime prevention, victim recognition, and communicative censure—as in Antony Duff's expressive theory—need not fail simply because purely retributive or purely deterrent accounts face objections.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.When the state imposes punishment, it treats some people in ways that would typically (outside the context of punishment) be impermissible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The state subjects punished individuals to intentionally burdensome treatment and to the condemnation of the community.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The various attempted justifications of this intentionally burdensome condemnatory treatment fail.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.