Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Quasi-dependence cannot adequately account for trumping p... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Quasi-dependence cannot adequately account for trumping pre-emption cases in causation.

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.In the trumping pre-emption scenario, the Major's orders have causal priority over the Sergeant's orders because the troops obey the Major first.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The advance quasi-depends on the Sergeant's orders, because in a world where the Major gives no order, the advance would depend on the Sergeant's orders.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Yet intuitively, the Major—not the Sergeant—caused the advance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Related

    If quasi-dependence were sufficient for causation, the Sergeant's orders would c...In the trumping pre-emption scenario, the Major's orders have causal priority ov...The advance quasi-depends on the Sergeant's orders, because in a world where the...Yet intuitively, the Major—not the Sergeant—caused the advance.

    Similar

    Counterfactual dependence requires only that the cause was necessary i...77%The new counterfactual theory of causation does not handle trumping co...77%Counterfactual theories of causation rely on effects generally counter...76%If quasi-dependence were sufficient for causation, the Sergeant's orde...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: david-lewis
    View source passageHide passage
    Another argument is that quasi-dependence cannot account for what came to be known as ‘trumping pre-emption’. Lewis illustrated this idea with an example from Jonathan Schaffer (2000). The troops are disposed to obey all orders from either the Sergeant or the Major. But they give priority to the Major’s orders, due to the Major’s higher rank. Both the Major and the Sergeant order the troops to advance, and they do advance. Intuitively, it is the Major, not the Sergeant, who caused the advance, s
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit