Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Yet intuitively, the Major—not the Sergeant—caused the ad... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Quasi-dependence cannot adequately account for trumping pre-emption cases in causation.

    Yet intuitively, the Major—not the Sergeant—caused the advance.

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Related

    If quasi-dependence were sufficient for causation, the Sergeant's orders would c...In the trumping pre-emption scenario, the Major's orders have causal priority ov...Quasi-dependence cannot adequately account for trumping pre-emption cases in cau...The advance quasi-depends on the Sergeant's orders, because in a world where the...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The advance quasi-depends on the Sergeant's orders, because in a world...76%Geneticization is the consequence of an increased capacity to manipula...72%Aristotelian epagōgē is best understood as an immediate apprehension o...71%Particularism implies Outcome Independence (OI)70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: david-lewis
    View source passageHide passage
    Another argument is that quasi-dependence cannot account for what came to be known as ‘trumping pre-emption’. Lewis illustrated this idea with an example from Jonathan Schaffer (2000). The troops are disposed to obey all orders from either the Sergeant or the Major. But they give priority to the Major’s orders, due to the Major’s higher rank. Both the Major and the Sergeant order the troops to advance, and they do advance. Intuitively, it is the Major, not the Sergeant, who caused the advance, s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective