Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Quine's naturalism establishes that no proposition is imm... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Certain propositions (such as the laws of logic and anti-skeptical presuppositions) are rationally acceptable without evidence, and this entitlement on no grounds constitutes a priori justification.

    Quine's naturalism establishes that no proposition is immune from revision in light of recalcitrant experience, including logical laws.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Scientific history shows logic itself has been revised: classical logic abandoned for quantum logic in some interpretations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If logic were unrevisable, we couldn't explain why we rationally abandoned certain logical principles across different domains.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Quine's holism shows beliefs form an interconnected web where even core logical beliefs can absorb empirical pressure from the periphery.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Revising logic itself requires using logic to argue for the revision, making the claim self-undermining and incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Apparent logic revisions (quantum logic) are better explained as changes in *models* or *interpretation*, not in fundamental logical laws.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Some propositions (like non-contradiction) seem necessarily true independent of experience; granting this limits Quine's universality claim.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Apparent logic revisions (quantum logic) are better explained as changes in *mod...Certain propositions (such as the laws of logic and anti-skeptical presuppositio...If logic were unrevisable, we couldn't explain why we rationally abandoned certa...Quine's holism shows beliefs form an interconnected web where even core logical ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Revising logic itself requires using logic to argue for the revision, making the...Scientific history shows logic itself has been revised: classical logic abandone...Some propositions (like non-contradiction) seem necessarily true independent of ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit