Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Ratification is defined in terms of an option's expected ... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→An option is self-ratifying if and only if it maximizes expected utility given its realization.

    Ratification is defined in terms of an option's expected utility given its realization rather than given a decision to realize it.

    ConsequentialismModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityConsequentialism

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    An option is self-ratifying if and only if it maximizes expected utility given i...

    Related

    An option is self-ratifying if and only if it maximizes expected utility given i...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    An option that maximizes expected utility given its own realization meets the ra...

    Similar

    Justice, properly understood, is nothing more than utility applied to ...81%An option is self-ratifying if and only if it maximizes expected utili...80%An option is self-ratifying if it maximizes expected utility given its...79%Therefore, the expected utility of a decision may differ from the expe...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: decision-causal
    View source passageHide passage
    Weirich (1985) and Harper (1986) define ratification in terms of an option’s expected utility given its realization rather than given a decision to realize it. An option is self-ratifying if and only if it maximizes expected utility given its realization. This account of ratification accommodates cases in which an option and a decision to realize it have different expected utilities. Weirich and Harper also assume causal decision theory’s formula for expected utility. In the case of Death in Dam

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective