Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Re-identifying immaterial souls by re-identifying their embodiment is not always possible.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Bodily continuity, even when disputed, remains the primary criterion by which personal identity is adjudicated in practice across legal and social institutions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The impossibility of resolution in edge cases does not undermine the general reliability of embodiment as a re-identification method for souls.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Locke's distinction between personal identity and substance identity shows that psychological continuity—memory and consciousness—can re-identify persons independently of bodily or soul-substance tracking.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If immaterial souls can be re-identified through psychological continuity chains rather than embodiment, then the failure of bodily re-identification does not entail the failure of soul re-identification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
Prior at least to the advent of DNA testing, cases of disputed identity could not always be settled by re-identifying bodies.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.