Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Realism regarding the putative target of detection is wel... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Realism regarding the putative target of detection is well-supported when distinct modes of detection reveal the same thing.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.One and the same thing is apparently revealed by distinct modes of detection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.It would be an extraordinary coincidence if the supposed target of these revelations did not exist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Distinct detection methods often share theoretical assumptions, so their convergence may reflect common theory rather than a mind-independent target.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Van Fraassen's constructive empiricism holds that empirical adequacy, not ontological convergence, is the proper epistemic goal of science.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.What appears as independent confirmation can be the coordinated projection of a single theoretical framework onto multiple instruments.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Laudan's pessimistic meta-induction shows that historically successful convergent detections have repeatedly pointed to entities later abandoned (caloric, phlogiston, the ether).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If past convergent detection repeatedly failed to track real entities, the inference from convergence to realism is inductively undermined.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    Distinct detection methods often share theoretical assumptions, so their converg...If past convergent detection repeatedly failed to track real entities, the infer...It would be an extraordinary coincidence if the supposed target of these revelat...Laudan's pessimistic meta-induction shows that historically successful convergen...
    +3 moreShow less
    One and the same thing is apparently revealed by distinct modes of detection.Van Fraassen's constructive empiricism holds that empirical adequacy, not ontolo...What appears as independent confirmation can be the coordinated projection of a ...

    Similar

    One and the same thing is apparently revealed by distinct modes of det...85%Greater corroboration by different means of detection provides stronge...80%Multiple means of detection can employ distinct apparatuses and exploi...79%Techniques of putative detection are often constructed or calibrated p...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: scientific-realism
    View source passageHide passage
    The argument from corroboration thus runs as follows. The fact that one and the same thing is apparently revealed by distinct modes of detection suggests that it would be an extraordinary coincidence if the supposed target of these revelations did not, in fact, exist. The greater the extent to which detections can be corroborated by different means, the stronger the argument for realism regarding their putative target. The argument here can be viewed as resting on an intuition similar to that un
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit