Reanalyzing counterexamples to strong individual supervenience as global supervenience failures presupposes non-haecceitist modal semantics, which the haecceitist rightfully rejects.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Haecceitist(metaphysics/identity): Related to the philosophical idea that individual things have a special 'thisness' or identity beyond just their physical properties—so two people could be physically identical but still be fundamentally different individuals.
Modal semantics(describing Carnap's philosophical approach): A system for understanding the meaning of statements that talk about possibility, necessity, and what could or must be true (as opposed to just what is actually true).
Non-haecceitist(as used in metaphysics): Someone who believes that things are only defined by their properties and qualities, not by any special individual identity beyond that.
counterexamples(as evidence used to challenge the justified true belief analysis): Specific cases or scenarios that prove a general claim or definition wrong by showing an exception to the rule.

Based on where you are in your exploration