Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Reflexivity can emerge from relational structures even wh... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→ET-simultaneity is not reflexive.

    Reflexivity can emerge from relational structures even when not stipulated by definition, as Leibniz's identity of indiscernibles demonstrates.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Identity of indiscernibles shows reflexivity emerges logically: if x and y share all properties, then x=y, making x necessarily related to itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Relational structures can generate reflexivity without explicit stipulation, as symmetry and transitivity often force self-relation mathematically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Natural emergence of reflexivity from deeper principles is more parsimonious than treating it as an independent axiom requiring separate justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Identity of indiscernibles conflates logical equivalence with reflexivity; it defines when things are identical, not how reflexivity emerges.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Many relational structures (partial orders, strict orderings) are non-reflexive by nature; reflexivity cannot emerge universally from relations alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Claiming reflexivity emerges from relations requires prior reflexive properties already embedded in the definitions of those very relations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Afterlife & Death1 linked

    Related

    Claiming reflexivity emerges from relations requires prior reflexive properties ...ET-simultaneity is not reflexive.Identity of indiscernibles conflates logical equivalence with reflexivity; it de...Identity of indiscernibles shows reflexivity emerges logically: if x and y share...
    +3 moreShow less
    Many relational structures (partial orders, strict orderings) are non-reflexive ...Natural emergence of reflexivity from deeper principles is more parsimonious tha...Relational structures can generate reflexivity without explicit stipulation, as ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit