Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Reflexivity can emerge from relational structures even when not stipulated by definition, as Leibniz's identity of indiscernibles demonstrates.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Identity of indiscernibles conflates logical equivalence with reflexivity; it defines when things are identical, not how reflexivity emerges.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Many relational structures (partial orders, strict orderings) are non-reflexive by nature; reflexivity cannot emerge universally from relations alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Claiming reflexivity emerges from relations requires prior reflexive properties already embedded in the definitions of those very relations.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Identity of indiscernibles shows reflexivity emerges logically: if x and y share all properties, then x=y, making x necessarily related to itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Relational structures can generate reflexivity without explicit stipulation, as symmetry and transitivity often force self-relation mathematically.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Natural emergence of reflexivity from deeper principles is more parsimonious than treating it as an independent axiom requiring separate justification.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.