Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Reisman and Forber rely on Woodward's interventionist acc... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Reisman and Forber's experiment may not demonstrate that drift is a cause, but only that population size is a causal factor of evolutionary change

    Reisman and Forber rely on Woodward's interventionist account, which requires manipulation of a variable

    CausationPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageCausation

    Related

    It is unclear whether drift itself is being manipulated in Dobzhansky and Pavlov...Population size does not appear to be a processReisman and Forber's experiment may not demonstrate that drift is a cause, but o...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The interventionist account of causation holds that X is a cause of Y ...84%The interventionist model holds that X causes Y if and only if interve...80%The interventionist model thereby avoids a simple-minded holism that m...73%Reisman and Forber (2005) overlooked Woodward's criterion of invarianc...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: genetic-drift
    View source passageHide passage
    This is because it’s a bit unclear if drift is actually what is being manipulated in Dobzhansky and Pavlovsky’s (1957) experiments, or if it is just population size—and population size does not seem to be a process. Perhaps Reisman and Forber have simply shown that population size is a causal factor of evolutionary change in populations undergoing drift. They also seem to be taking Woodward’s account very literally, in that they seem to think that the “variable” that has to be manipulated must b

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective