Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Reisman and Forber's experiment may not demonstrate that ... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Reisman and Forber's experiment may not demonstrate that drift is a cause, but only that population size is a causal factor of evolutionary change

    CausationPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.It is unclear whether drift itself is being manipulated in Dobzhansky and Pavlovsky's (1957) experiments, or merely population size
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Population size does not appear to be a process
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Reisman and Forber rely on Woodward's interventionist account, which requires manipulation of a variable
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageCausation

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    It is unclear whether drift itself is being manipulated in Dobzhansky and Pavlov...Population size does not appear to be a processReisman and Forber rely on Woodward's interventionist account, which requires ma...

    Similar

    It is unclear whether drift itself is being manipulated in Dobzhansky ...90%It is reasonable to conceive of drift and natural selection as populat...85%Selection, mutation, migration, and drift all play causal roles in evo...84%The term 'drift' picks out a specific class of causal influences in po...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: genetic-drift
    View source passageHide passage
    This is because it’s a bit unclear if drift is actually what is being manipulated in Dobzhansky and Pavlovsky’s (1957) experiments, or if it is just population size—and population size does not seem to be a process. Perhaps Reisman and Forber have simply shown that population size is a causal factor of evolutionary change in populations undergoing drift. They also seem to be taking Woodward’s account very literally, in that they seem to think that the “variable” that has to be manipulated must b
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit