Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Representing that someone is stating that p is like stati... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Beardsley's argument fails because its two halves merge into one, undermining the distinction he relies upon.

    Representing that someone is stating that p is like stating that someone is stating that p — it is a speech act with a more complicated conceptual content and structure than simply stating that p.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Key Terms

    Representing that someone is stating that p(the main subject of the statement)
    Talking about the fact that another person made a claim or statement. The 'p' is just a placeholder for whatever that claim is.
    Speech act(core concept in the statement)
    An action performed by speaking or writing—like promising, requesting, or stating something. It's not just about the words themselves, but what you're actually doing by saying them.
    conceptual content(Contrasted with perceptual content which allegedly can be contradictory)
    Content of the kind found in propositional attitudes such as belief, which is argued to necessarily be consistent (non-contradictory)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    p (in formal logic)(notation used in the statement)
    A placeholder letter used to stand in for any statement or claim—think of it like a blank you can fill in with whatever sentence you want.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics3 linked

    Related

    Beardsley treats performing a speech act and representing the performance of a s...Beardsley's argument fails because its two halves merge into one, undermining th...Because representing is itself a speech act, the two halves of Beardsley's argum...Representing (in language) is itself a speech act, just as much as stating is.

    Similar

    Representing (in language) is itself a speech act, just as much as sta...83%Determinacy requires that a speaker must believe and implicate p for t...82%The proposition p expressed by David's utterance is distinct from the ...80%In cases of reminding or confession, a speaker means p by an utterance...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: beardsley-aesthetics
    View source passageHide passage
    But even if Beardsley’s view that a literary work is a representation or imitation of a speech act is acceptable, still another curious feature of the argument concerns his treatment of the distinction between performing a speech act and representing the performance of a speech act. Beardsley writes as if the two were mutually exclusive. They’re not. While it’s true that it’s one thing to state that p and quite another to represent that someone is stating that p, representing (in language) is it

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective