Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Resistance to compatibilism based on necessity is confuse... — Carmelics
    Home/Free Will & Foreknowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Resistance to compatibilism based on necessity is confused, because it conflates causal necessity with compulsion or force.

    CausationFree Will & Foreknowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.People believe that when A causes B, A compels or forces B.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Hume argues this belief is a mistake: causal necessity is only constant conjunction plus customary mental inference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If causal necessity does not involve force or compulsion, then necessity per se does not threaten liberty.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Free Will & ForeknowledgeCausation

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Hume argues this belief is a mistake: causal necessity is only constant conjunct...If causal necessity does not involve force or compulsion, then necessity per se ...People believe that when A causes B, A compels or forces B.

    Similar

    If causal necessity does not involve force or compulsion, then necessi...83%Causal necessity is nothing more than the constant conjunction of simi...81%Causal necessity does not threaten liberty, because causal necessity d...80%The concepts of causality and necessity arise from the operations of t...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: kant-hume-morality
    View source passageHide passage
    The second source of resistance to compatibilism stems from confusion about necessity. People are prone to think that necessity rules out liberty because they conflate necessity with compulsion or force. They believe that when A causes B, A compels or forces B. Hume holds that this is a mistake, however. Causal necessity is nothing more than the “constant conjunction” of similar objects and a customary inference of the mind from the one to the other (EHU 8.1.5). For example, experience shows tha
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit