Restricting 'primary eschatological views' to three options presupposes a specifically Christian propositional framework, smuggling a sectarian assumption into a purportedly exhaustive classification.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Eschatology(as used in religious philosophy): The study of end times or what happens at the end of the world or human history. Different religions have different views about how things will ultimately end.
Exhaustive classification(as used in logic and categorization): A complete list or grouping that supposedly covers all possible options with nothing left out.
Primary eschatological views(as used in religious philosophy): The main competing theories about how the world will end, especially in Christian theology (like the Rapture, the Second Coming of Christ, or the final judgment).
Propositional framework(as used in logic and epistemology): A set of basic beliefs or assumptions stated as facts that form the foundation for how someone thinks about a topic.
Sectarian(as used in religious criticism): Related to a specific religious group or denomination rather than being neutral or universal; favoring one particular faith over others.
Smuggling (in philosophy)(as used in critical analysis): Sneakily introducing an assumption or bias into an argument without acknowledging it, so readers don't notice the hidden assumption.

2 topics