Robson and Skorupski have demonstrated that Mill's conception of 'progressive beings' entails a hierarchical cultivation of character that aligns with Arnoldian conservative perfectionism, not liberal neutrality.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Arnoldian conservative perfectionism(as the philosophical position Mill's views align with): A philosophical view (named after thinker Matthew Arnold) that society should shape people toward an ideal of human excellence, guided by tradition and culture rather than individual choice.
Hierarchical cultivation of character(as what Mill's theory supposedly involves): The idea that people should develop themselves by ranking certain qualities as more valuable than others and deliberately working to improve the higher ones.
Mill(as the subject being discussed): John Stuart Mill was a 19th-century British philosopher who wrote influential ideas about liberty, happiness, and what makes a good life.
Robson and Skorupski(as the researchers making the argument): Modern philosophy scholars who have written scholarly interpretations and analyses of Mill's work.

Based on where you are in your exploration