Russell, as an empiricist about ethics, can coherently hold that 'good' rigidly designates a natural property whose identity with goodness is a substantive discovery, not a conceptual truth.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Empiricist about ethics(describing Russell's philosophical position): Someone who believes that our understanding of what is 'good' or 'bad' comes from experience and observation of the natural world, rather than from pure reasoning or intuition.
Natural property(as something that wrongness is supposedly reduced to): A characteristic or feature of something that can be observed, measured, or studied using scientific methods.
Rigidly designates(as used in philosophy of language and logic): A word or name that always points to the same specific thing, no matter what situation you're imagining or what time period you're talking about.
Russell: # Russell Russell most commonly refers to **Bertrand Russell**, a highly influential British philosopher, logician, and social critic (1872-1970) who fundamentally changed how we think about logic, language, and knowledge. He's famous for showing that common-sense reasoning can contain hidden contradictions and for arguing that philosophy should use the precision of mathematics to solve problems. Russell also became a prominent public intellectual who wrote about everything from religion to nuclear weapons, making him one of the most important thinkers of the 20th century.

Based on where you are in your exploration