Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Ruth Millikan's teleosemantic theory entails that the pro... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Psychological altruism does not entail biological altruism.

    Ruth Millikan's teleosemantic theory entails that the proper function of a mental state is fixed by its evolutionary history, not its proximate causal role.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Mental content must have determinate meaning; proximate causes alone allow multiple physical systems identical in causal role to differ in content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Evolutionary history explains why certain neural patterns reliably carry information about distal environmental features, grounding intentionality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Brain transplants and teleportation intuitions show content tracks origin, not current causation, supporting historical dependence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Mental states influence behavior through proximate neural mechanisms; evolutionary history is causally inert regarding current mental function.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Teleosemantic theory struggles with novel thoughts and learned behaviors that have no evolutionary history but possess clear intentional content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Content should be individuated by what determines rational inference; proximate computational role better explains cognitive systematicity than ancestry.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Brain transplants and teleportation intuitions show content tracks origin, not c...Content should be individuated by what determines rational inference; proximate ...Evolutionary history explains why certain neural patterns reliably carry informa...Mental content must have determinate meaning; proximate causes alone allow multi...
    +3 moreShow less
    Mental states influence behavior through proximate neural mechanisms; evolutiona...Psychological altruism does not entail biological altruism.Teleosemantic theory struggles with novel thoughts and learned behaviors that ha...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit