Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Sally's thoughts are determinately about Bill and not Bil... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The reduplication argument establishes that singular propositions exist and that some thought involves direct reference to individuals.

    Sally's thoughts are determinately about Bill and not Bill* (a qualitatively identical duplicate), which cannot be explained by descriptive content alone.

    Personal IdentityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Personal IdentityPhilosophy of Language

    Related

    An adequate account of reference to individuals in thought and language requires...The reduplication argument establishes that singular propositions exist and that...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Personal Identity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Sally's thoughts are determinately about Bill and not Bill*, even thou...86%Therefore Sally's thoughts are determinately about Bill and not Bill* ...85%Therefore C and D must be identical, contradicting the hypothesis that...80%Intuitively, Sally is thinking of Bill and not Bill* despite being una...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: propositions-singular
    View source passageHide passage
    We thus have a spectrum of views that agree that there is direct reference to individual in thought and language but disagree about its scope, from Russell's restrictive view of direct reference, according to which an agent can only think directly about her occurrent sense data, to the liberal view of direct reference held by Kaplan and Jeshion, according to which objects that have never been perceived can be thought about directly. All of these views respect the intuition that Sally's thoughts

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective