Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    SAT is in NP — Carmelics
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    SAT is in NP

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    3 topics

    Proof of definition segments2 linkedPhilosophy of Language2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    All sources support it
    1 linked

    Related

    Every problem X in NP can be reduced in polynomial time to SAT by encoding the c...Every problem X in NP is polynomial-time reducible to SATEvery problem X in NP is polynomial-time reducible to SAT via a reduction throug...For any NP machine N and input x, a propositional formula φ_{N,x} can be constru...
    +2 moreShow less
    SAT is NP-completeSAT is therefore NP-hard

    Similar

    BHP is in NP100%PRIMES is in P100%FACTORIZATION is in coNP100%FACTORIZATION is in NP100%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    We additionally say that a class \(\textbf{C}\) is closed under \(\leq_P\) if \(Y \in \textbf{C}\) and \(X \leq_P Y\) implies \(X \in \textbf{C}\). [16] A problem \(Y\) is said to be hard for a class \(\textbf{C}\) if \(X \leq_P Y\) for all \(X \in \textbf{C}\). Finally \(Y\) is said to be complete for \(\textbf{C}\) if it is both hard for \(\textbf{C}\) and also a member of \(\textbf{C}\). e. so-called NP-complete problems. A canonical example of such a problem is a time-bounded variant of the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective