Scanlon explicitly designed the individual-complaint threshold to block the utilitarian move of sacrificing one person for aggregate gains, as detailed in 'What We Owe to Each Other' (1998).

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Scanlon: # Scanlon Tim Scanlon is an influential American philosopher known for developing a theory of ethics based on the idea that actions are right if they could be justified to others through principles everyone could reasonably accept. Rather than focusing on happiness or duty, his approach emphasizes what we can defend to each other as fair-minded people, making morality fundamentally about mutual respect and agreement. He's considered one of the most important moral philosophers of our time because his ideas have reshaped how philosophers think about fairness, responsibility, and what we owe to one another.
What We Owe to Each Other(as the cited work): A major 1998 book by philosopher T.M. Scanlon that argues moral wrongness is fundamentally about violating principles that others could reasonably reject.
individual-complaint threshold(Scanlon's ethical concept): A rule that protects individuals from being harmed, even if that harm would benefit many other people—basically saying you can't justify hurting one person just because it makes lots of others better off.
sacrificing one person for aggregate gains

Based on where you are in your exploration