Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Scholastics treat only 'possible,' 'impossible,' 'true,' ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The scholastic treatment of modality is inadequate because it restricts modal terms to only six words.

    Scholastics treat only 'possible,' 'impossible,' 'true,' 'false,' 'necessary,' and 'contingent' as modal terms.

    Modality & PossibilityPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageModality & Possibility

    Related

    Latin expresses modality through many additional terms such as 'likely/unlikely,...The restriction to six modal terms is arbitrary and fails the criteria of refine...The scholastic treatment of modality is inadequate because it restricts modal te...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    There are three logical alternatives: God is impossible, God is contin...84%A nonstandard semantics of modal adverbs like 'necessarily' and 'conti...83%Latin expresses modality through many additional terms such as 'likely...81%If God is possible, God cannot exist merely contingently, because cont...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: lorenzo-valla
    View source passageHide passage
    This approach is also evident in Valla’s analysis of the proposition of which a syllogism or argument consists. Propositions are traditionally divided according to quantity (universal of particular) and to quality (affirmative and negative). Quantity and quality are indicated by words that are called signa (markers, signs): “all,” “any,” “not,” “no one,” and so forth. In Book II of the Repastinatio, Valla considers a much wider range of words than the medieval logicians, who had mainly worked wi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective