Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Schumpeter's and Hayek's epistemic arguments establish th... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Reducing inequality of decision-making power within the economic sphere is intrinsically significant, not merely instrumentally significant.

    Schumpeter's and Hayek's epistemic arguments establish that dispersed price information cannot be replicated by collective deliberative structures without catastrophic efficiency losses.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Catastrophic efficiency losses(as the negative outcome being predicted)
    Severe, dramatic reductions in how well something works or how much gets accomplished.
    Collective deliberative structures(as the alternative to markets being compared)
    Groups of people (like government committees) that come together to discuss and make decisions by talking things through.
    Dispersed price information(as the information that markets process)
    Knowledge about what things cost that is spread out across many different people and places, rather than gathered in one central location.
    Epistemic arguments(as the second type of argument Kripke used)
    Arguments related to knowledge and what we can know—focusing on whether something can be known a priori (without experience) or requires empirical observation.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Hayek(as a philosopher of economics and liberty)
    Friedrich Hayek was an economist and philosopher who believed that free markets work better than government planning, partly because no central authority can gather enough information to make good decisions.
    Schumpeter(as a historical economist whose ideas are being referenced)
    Joseph Schumpeter was an economist who argued that capitalism thrives on innovation and competition, with entrepreneurs constantly disrupting existing markets.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Democracy & Governance1 linkedRights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    Reducing inequality of decision-making power within the economic sphere is intri...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective