Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Self-deceivers can recognize and resist the influence of ... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Self-deceivers can be morally responsible for individual episodes of self-deception or for the vices from which they spring

    Self-deceivers can recognize and resist the influence of emotion and desire on their belief acquisition and retention, particularly in matters they deem important

    Consciousness & MindMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityConsciousness & Mind

    Related

    Many sources of bias are controllableMoral responsibility requires that agents have control over the actions in quest...Most non-intentionalist accounts allow for such responsibilitySelf-deceivers can be morally responsible for individual episodes of self-decept...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Self-deceivers show the limits of the folk psychological concepts of b...85%Self-deceivers rarely possess the requisite awareness of the biasing m...85%Self-deceivers can be attributed the unconscious belief that ~p84%Self-deceivers may have an obligation to overcome self-deception even ...84%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: self-deception
    View source passageHide passage
    Initially, non-intentionalist approaches may seem to remove the agent from responsibility by rendering the process by which she is self-deceived subintentional. If my anxiety, fear, or desire triggers a process that ineluctably leads me to hold the self-deceptive belief, I cannot be held responsible for holding that belief. How can I be held responsible for processes that operate without my knowledge and which are set in motion without my intention? Most non-intentionalist accounts, however, do

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective