Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Sen's 'minimal liberalism' condition uses an inadequate f... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Sen's impossibility result is not relevant or applicable to individual rights in social choice theory

    Sen's 'minimal liberalism' condition uses an inadequate formalization of the notion of individual rights

    Democracy & GovernanceRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertyDemocracy & Governance

    Related

    Sen's impossibility result is not relevant or applicable to individual rights in...

    Similar

    Applying minimal liberalism to the Lewd-Prude example generates the so...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    77%
    Mill's own conception of liberal rights requires more than the harm pr...75%
    Mill's perfectionist justification of liberal essentials contrasts wit...75%
    Spencer's liberal utilitarianism differs fundamentally from Mill's uti...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: social-choice
    View source passageHide passage
    However, several authors have challenged the relevance of Sen’s result, by arguing that his ‘minimal liberalism’ condition uses an inadequate formalization of the notion of individual rights (e.g., Gaertner, Pattanaik, and Suzumura 1992; Dowding and van Hees 2003).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective