Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Senses correspond many-one to objects (multiple senses ca... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Fregean propositions are more fine-grained than Russellian propositions

    Senses correspond many-one to objects (multiple senses can pick out the same object)

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Fregean propositions are more fine-grained than Russellian propositions

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Fregean propositions correspond many-one to Russellian propositions (multiple Fr...
    Russellian propositions correspond many-one to intensions (multiple Russellian p...
    Senses are objective, in that more than one person can express thoughts with a g...

    Similar

    Fregean propositions correspond many-one to Russellian propositions (m...81%Where 'one' presupposes a plural subject or a subject with many parts,...78%Russellian propositions correspond many-one to intensions (multiple Ru...78%D1 and D8, taken together, yield the result that the one must be both ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: meaning
    View source passageHide passage
    Senses are then objective, in that more than one person can express thoughts with a given sense, and correspond many-one to objects. Thus, just as Russellian propositions correspond many-one to intensions, Fregean propositions correspond many-one to Russellian propositions. This is sometimes expressed by the claim that Fregean contents are more fine-grained than Russellian contents (or intensions).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective