Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Shaftesbury establishes a hierarchy in which beauty of mi... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Physical objects are not really beautiful, and the wise person should aspire to care only about the beauty of minds.

    Shaftesbury establishes a hierarchy in which beauty of mind is superior to beauty of physical objects.

    Aesthetics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Aesthetics

    Connections

    1 topic

    Virtue Ethics2 linked

    Related

    Physical objects are not really beautiful, and the wise person should aspire to ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Shaftesbury's points about beauty of mind suggest physical beauty is merely an e...

    Similar

    Material beauty is a lesser kind of beauty than the beauty of a mind, ...83%The source of beauty in any object is mind82%Material objects signify minds that possess mental perfections capable...82%Shaftesbury's points about beauty of mind suggest physical beauty is m...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: shaftesbury
    View source passageHide passage
    Adherents of the instrumentalist interpretation take Shaftesbury’s points about beauty of mind and the hierarchy as evidence that Shaftesbury thinks physical objects are not really beautiful at all, and that we should aspire to care only about the beauty of minds (see especially Tiffany 1923). On this view, the beauty of objects (including all art) is merely an early stage of appreciation of beauty that the wise person eventually leaves behind. Against this interpretation, however, Glauser argue

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective