Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Sidgwick and later Scheffler demonstrated that agent-rela... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The tension between cosmopolitanism and local attachments is real but unproblematic

    Sidgwick and later Scheffler demonstrated that agent-relative permissions create irreducible asymmetries between impartial and partial demands that no unified moral theory has successfully dissolved.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Agent-relative permissions genuinely conflict with impartial demands in concrete cases without logical resolution.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Historical attempts (contractarianism, utilitarianism, virtue ethics) each privilege one side, leaving the tension unresolved.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The persistent disagreement among moral theorists suggests the asymmetry may be fundamental rather than theoretically solvable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Pluralist moral theories can accommodate both demands as legitimate but different in scope, avoiding the need for dissolution.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The appearance of irreducible asymmetry may reflect our concepts' limits rather than reality's structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Scheffler himself endorsed agent-centered prerogatives within consequentialism, showing partial reconciliation is theoretically possible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Agent-relative permissions(as an ethical concept)
    Rules that allow a person to act based on their own goals, relationships, or interests rather than what would be best for everyone. For example, you might be 'permitted' to spend money on your own education rather than donating it all to charity.
    Dissolved(describing how one might try to solve the problem)
    In philosophy, to 'dissolve' a problem means to show it wasn't really a problem in the first place, often by clarifying what was confusing about it.
    Impartial demands(as an ethical concept)
    Moral requirements that treat everyone equally and don't care about special relationships or personal goals. An impartial demand might say 'you should help whoever needs it most, regardless of whether they're your friend.'
    Partial demands(as an ethical concept)
    Moral requirements based on special relationships or personal connections you have. A partial demand might say 'you should take care of your own children first' or 'loyalty to friends matters.'
    Scheffler(referenced as the philosopher making the critique)
    Samuel Scheffler is a contemporary philosopher who studies ethics and wrote influential critiques about how we think morality should work, particularly questioning whether it's okay to prioritize your own projects and interests.
    Sidgwick
    Henry Sidgwick (1838-1900) was a British philosopher who made important contributions to ethics, particularly by arguing that morality should be based on reason and impartial concern for everyone's well-being rather than just following traditions or religious rules. He is famous for developing "utilitarianism," the idea that the right action is the one that produces the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. His work remains influential in moral philosophy and practical ethics today because he thoughtfully addressed how we should balance our own interests with our obligations to others.
    Unified moral theory(as used in ethics)
    A single, consistent set of ethical principles that explains all of morality in one framework—like one rule book that covers every situation.
    asymmetries(describing differences between people in medical situations)
    Situations where things are unequal or imbalanced—in this case, where the doctor and patient have different amounts of power, knowledge, or responsibility.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Democracy & Governance1 linkedRights & Liberty1 linked

    Related

    Agent-relative permissions genuinely conflict with impartial demands in concrete...Historical attempts (contractarianism, utilitarianism, virtue ethics) each privi...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    Pluralist moral theories can accommodate both demands as legitimate but differen...
    Scheffler himself endorsed agent-centered prerogatives within consequentialism, ...
    +3 moreShow less
    The appearance of irreducible asymmetry may reflect our concepts' limits rather ...The persistent disagreement among moral theorists suggests the asymmetry may be ...The tension between cosmopolitanism and local attachments is real but unproblema...