Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Simply positing God does not provide a theoretical solution to the Problem of Evil

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Theistic frameworks like Plantinga's Free Will Defense demonstrate that positing God generates specific logical resources unavailable to atheism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The existence of a necessarily good God entails that evil must be explicable in terms of greater goods, transforming evil from brute fact to meaningful datum.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A brute-fact atheist worldview provides no theoretical framework at all for distinguishing necessary from unnecessary evil, making the Problem of Evil uniquely tractable within theism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Swinburne's epistemic distance argument shows that God's existence entails principled reasons why divine hiddenness and permitted suffering would be expected features of reality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God's existence generates testable predictions about the structure of evil (soul-making, moral development), positing God has genuine explanatory power over rival hypotheses.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If God exists then there cannot be unnecessary evil, so there must be a solution to the Problem of Evil
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.However, merely positing God does not make it easier to theoretically reconcile apparent unnecessary evil with the nature of an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent deity
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.