Social obligations are not fully dischargeable at a fixed point, since ongoing relationships—familial, civic, mentorial—generate new duties continuously (Hardwig, 'Is There a Duty to Die?').

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

'Is There a Duty to Die?'(the specific work by Hardwig being referenced): An influential essay that questions whether people have a moral obligation to end their own lives in certain circumstances, like when they're terminally ill.
Civic(as used in the phrase 'civic project'): Related to a city, community, or how people live together in society.
Dischargeable(describing whether duties can be finished once and for all): Able to be completed or fulfilled so that you're done with the responsibility.
Familial(one type of ongoing relationship mentioned): Relating to family members and the bonds between them.
John Hardwig(the source cited for this idea): A contemporary philosopher known for writing about end-of-life ethics, particularly examining difficult moral questions around death and dying.
Mentorial(a third example of an ongoing relationship): Relating to the relationship between a mentor (an experienced guide) and the person they're teaching or advising.
Ongoing relationships(examples of relationships that create continuous duties): Connections with people that continue over time and keep developing, rather than being one-time interactions.
Social obligations(the main subject of the statement): Duties or responsibilities you have toward other people and society because of your relationships and membership in a community.

1 topic