Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Some biological structures are spandrels, by-products, or... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Wakefield's evolutionary dysfunction account of disease is too restrictive because it excludes illnesses arising from biological structures with no evolved function

    Some biological structures are spandrels, by-products, or have non-selective histories

    BioethicsCausation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge4 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    A structure with no evolved function cannot malfunction in Wakefield's senseOn Wakefield's account, evolutionary dysfunction is partly constitutive of disea...Therefore, a structure with no evolved function cannot be diseased in the primar...Wakefield's evolutionary dysfunction account of disease is too restrictive becau...

    Similar

    Computational ALife and biological ALife involve fundamentally differe...72%Deception about biological origins is only a severe form of disrespect...71%Therefore, a structure with no evolved function cannot be diseased in ...70%Genuine biological species are defined by historical-causal continuity...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: health-disease
    View source passageHide passage
    An evolutionary approach faces problems in specifying what the overall evolved function of a system might be and showing how functions contribute to it. First, it is very difficult to assess the relevant evidence that a given biological systems is — as in Wakefield’s treatment — the product of natural selection (Davies 2001, Chapter 5). Since many ailments do not prevent one from living and having children, it is even harder to show that a disease is necessarily the product of a malfunction that

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective