Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Wakefield's evolutionary dysfunction account of disease i... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Wakefield's evolutionary dysfunction account of disease is too restrictive because it excludes illnesses arising from biological structures with no evolved function

    BioethicsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.On Wakefield's account, evolutionary dysfunction is partly constitutive of disease
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Some biological structures are spandrels, by-products, or have non-selective histories
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A structure with no evolved function cannot malfunction in Wakefield's sense
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsTruth & Knowledge

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation1 linked

    Related

    A structure with no evolved function cannot malfunction in Wakefield's senseOn Wakefield's account, evolutionary dysfunction is partly constitutive of disea...Some biological structures are spandrels, by-products, or have non-selective his...Therefore, a structure with no evolved function cannot be diseased in the primar...

    Similar

    On Wakefield's account, evolutionary dysfunction is partly constitutiv...87%The connection between disease and evolutionary function cannot be fou...86%Therefore, a structure with no evolved function cannot be diseased in ...86%Wakefield's connection of disease to an evolutionary concept of functi...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: health-disease
    View source passageHide passage
    An evolutionary approach faces problems in specifying what the overall evolved function of a system might be and showing how functions contribute to it. First, it is very difficult to assess the relevant evidence that a given biological systems is — as in Wakefield’s treatment — the product of natural selection (Davies 2001, Chapter 5). Since many ailments do not prevent one from living and having children, it is even harder to show that a disease is necessarily the product of a malfunction that
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit