Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Some desires (e.g., a desire to drink a saucer of mud, a ... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Desires for worthless objects do not generate practical reasons, which undermines the internalist thesis that desire or motivation is the source of reasons

    Some desires (e.g., a desire to drink a saucer of mud, a desire to drink a can of paint, a disposition to turn on radios whenever they are off) clearly do not generate any practical reasons

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Desires(Contrasted with wishes as arising from inclination rather than reason)
    Blind powers born from temperament; non-rational appetitive states.
    Disposition(as used in metaphysics)
    A tendency or potential for something to behave in a certain way under specific conditions—like how sugar has the disposition to dissolve when placed in water.
    practical reasons

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (Used in the context of whether desires generate normative reasons for action)
    Reasons that bear on what an agent ought to do or how an agent ought to act

    Related

    Desires for worthless objects do not generate practical reasons, which undermine...If reasons internalism derives its justification from the explanatory power of t...The relation between desire/motivation and reasons is not consistent, since some...

    Similar

    These desires seem not to generate genuine practical reasons87%An explanation of why some desires fail to generate reasons may reveal...82%The relation between desire/motivation and reasons is not consistent, ...81%Something other than desire or motivation may be the genuine source of...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: reasons-internal-external
    View source passageHide passage
    A related objection consists in the complaint that agents can have desires that clearly do not generate any practical reasons because they are for worthless objects. Prominent examples in the literature include a desire to drink a saucer of mud or a can of paint, and a disposition to turn on radios whenever they are off. As noted in section 3.1.3, these examples can’t provide direct counterexamples to any sort of reasons internalism, because reasons internalism itself places only a necessary con

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective