Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Some failures of repeatability in physical experiments are genuinely due to quantum indeterminism, not merely failures of experimental control.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
The epistemic inaccessibility of true initial conditions is indistinguishable in practice from ontological indeterminism (Laplace's demon argument).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
No experiment can rule out hidden classical variables as the source of variance, as Bohm's 1952 pilot-wave theory demonstrates empirically.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Decoherence theory shows that quantum indeterminacy is effectively suppressed at macro-scales by environmental entanglement before influencing classical outcomes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Coin flips and hard drive failures operate at scales where thermal noise—a classical, deterministic-in-principle phenomenon—vastly dominates quantum variance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
At least some failures of repeatability in systems such as hard drives or coin-flipping experiments are attributable to quantum indeterminism.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
These failures cannot be fully eliminated by isolating the system or establishing identical initial conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.