Source physicalism, unlike omni-theism, has a structural commitment to bottom-up emergence that makes simple micro-level architecture a predicted necessity, not a contingent feature.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Structural commitment(describing what physicalism requires)
A built-in, unavoidable feature of a theory—something the theory requires by its basic design rather than just allowing as optional.
omni-theism(Used as the target hypothesis being challenged by probabilistic atheistic arguments)
The belief in the existence of an omni-God (a God possessing all-encompassing attributes such as omnipotence, omniscience, and omnibenevolence)
source physicalism(The alternative hypothesis employed in the low priors argument)
An alternative hypothesis to omni-theism, posited as many times more probable than omni-theism; argued to be compatible with some forms of theism in which God is an emergent entity