Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Space is homogeneous and uniform, so there would be no re... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Absolute space violates the principle of sufficient reason.

    Space is homogeneous and uniform, so there would be no reason for God to choose one orientation over any other.

    Against a future action of GodDivine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesAgainst a future action of God

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Natural Theology
    1 linked

    Related

    Absolute space violates the principle of sufficient reason.Any situation where an agent acts without a sufficient reason violates the princ...If absolute space exists independently of objects, God could place objects withi...

    Similar

    Any such decision by God would be arbitrary, since there is no suffici...88%The conceivability of God choosing an orientation within absolute spac...78%The idea that God could place objects within absolute space with one o...76%Proclus's Proposition 2 holds that what participates in the One is bot...72%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kant-spacetime
    View source passageHide passage
    The view that space cannot exist independently of objects at any given instant does seem to entail that space cannot be utterly devoid of objects. Leibniz thinks that space is the order of the actual and possible relations among objects, so he has the resources to say that space can contain empty sectors—see New Essays, 127, and L 5: 43—but it seems he cannot claim that space is altogether empty, for then object relations would be absent. Yet this view seems perfectly compatible with the idea th

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective