Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Standard cosmology with time-independent gravity suffices to account for the large number coincidence that impressed Dirac, without requiring that gravity varies with time.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Our existence as observers is tied to the presence of mainline stars like the sun and chemical elements produced in supernovae.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.These conditions for life's existence only obtain during a specific cosmic period — the same period in which the large number coincidence holds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore, given that we exist, we could only have found ourselves in the cosmic period where the coincidence holds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.